ZeroDrift raises $10M to enforce AI compliance without degrading speed
A new startup positions itself between large language models and end users, using deterministic rules plus targeted LLM rewrites to catch compliance violations faster than conventional approaches.
Anthropic's Christopher Olah Takes Center Stage at Vatican's First AI Encyclical
The Pope invites Anthropic cofounder to present on AI ethics, marking unprecedented alignment between the Catholic Church and Silicon Valley safety research.
Chatbot Jailbreaks Evolve Beyond Simple Exploits as AI Systems Learn Conversational Vulnerabilities
Hackers are moving past crude prompt-injection attacks to exploit how chatbots handle nuanced conversation—a shift that reveals deeper structural weaknesses in AI safety design.
SpaceX Discloses Grok's 'Spicy' Mode as IPO Risk Factor, Lists $530M Litigation Reserve
SpaceX's IPO filing reveals xAI's permissive AI chatbot modes expose the company to regulatory investigation and reputational harm, with $530M set aside for potential litigation losses.
Former OpenAI Safety Researchers Target xAI's Record Ahead of SpaceX IPO
Ex-OpenAI staffers and AI safety groups warn investors that xAI's safety lapses could complicate SpaceX's planned $75B IPO filing.
Beyond the Courtroom: Who Really Loses in Musk v. Altman
As closing arguments conclude in the Musk-Altman trial, nonprofit accountability and AI safety culture emerge as the trial's true casualties.
Pennsylvania First State to Sue Over AI Chatbot Impersonating a Doctor
Pennsylvania sued Character.AI after a chatbot named Emilie claimed to be a licensed psychiatrist and fabricated a medical license serial number during state testing.
Claude's Cooperative Design Becomes Its Vulnerability in Mindgard's Gaslighting Attack
AI red-teaming firm Mindgard exploited Claude's helpfulness and humility to extract erotica, malicious code, and explosive-assembly instructions — without a single direct request.
Arizona Deepfake Lawsuit Tests Liability for Those Who Teach, Not Just Create
An Arizona civil suit alleges three Phoenix men built a dual-revenue scheme: selling AI-generated non-consensual intimate imagery and subscription courses teaching others to replicate it.